How can automated ad reporting transform CTV campaigns into predictable, high-ROI growth engines?

12Connected TV (CTV) advertising now reaches over 90% of U.S. households, but most marketers still struggle with manual reporting, fragmented data, and unactionable dashboards. Automated ad reporting turns raw CTV data into clear, real-time performance insights, letting teams quickly optimize toward conversions, ROAS, and incremental revenue instead of just impressions.

---

Why is CTV ad reporting still so broken for most brands?

CTV spend is growing fast, but reporting often lags behind. Projections show that by 2026, global CTV ad spend will exceed $70 billion, with performance-driven KPIs now dominating spend decisions. Yet many teams still rely on stitched-together spreadsheets, delayed files from multiple platforms, and lagging dashboards that don’t reflect what’s happening in real time.

Most CTV campaigns are measured with a mix of DSP-level metrics (impressions, CPM, viewability), third-party verification data, and downstream analytics (web/app conversions). Without automation, these datasets live in silos, require manual reconciliation, and are often out of sync by days or even weeks. This makes it nearly impossible to:

• Quickly detect underperforming creatives or segments

• Adjust bids and budgets in response to real campaign behavior

• Prove accurate ROAS to leadership or finance teams

Data gaps are especially painful for performance-focused brands. A common scenario is spending heavily on CTV for app installs or e‑commerce, only to see a “lift” in web traffic but no clear attribution of which device, household, or creative drove each sale. This forces teams to rely on rules-based attribution (like “view-through” windows) instead of cross-device, cross-channel truth.

---

What are the biggest pain points in current CTV reporting?

Manual processes eat up hours every week. Campaign managers often spend 5–10 hours manually pulling data from DSPs, MMM models, attribution tools, and analytics platforms, then cleaning, aligning, and building dashboards. This time could be better spent on strategy, creative testing, or audience optimization.

Data quality and consistency are major issues. Source systems often use different time zones, definitions (e.g., “view” vs. “completion”), and APIs, leading to mismatches between billed impressions, delivered impressions, and attributed conversions. Even simple questions like “What was yesterday’s CPM?” can yield three different numbers across tools.

Speed and agility are limited. In a typical CTV buy, inventory is bought programmatically in real time, but performance data is only available hours or days later. Without near real-time reporting, even automated optimization systems can’t react fast enough to short-lived demand spikes or creative fatigue.

Finally, there’s a lack of focus on business outcomes. Many CTV dashboards highlight “brand” metrics (reach, frequency, impressions) while burying or omitting hard conversion KPIs like app installs, purchases, or cost per action. This disconnect makes it difficult to show CTV as a true performance channel, not just an awareness play.

---

How do traditional CTV reporting tools fall short?

Traditional dashboards and BI tools are often too rigid. They require upfront modeling, schema definitions, and complex data pipelines that can’t keep up with fast-changing CTV strategies, new KPIs, or campaign structures. When a new tactic is tested (e.g., OTT vs. FAST, new creative formats, or new attribution models), updating the reporting stack can take days or weeks.

Most CTV platforms offer only basic reporting suites. They provide standard campaigns, line items, and creative-level tables, but lack:

• Automated alerting for out-of-line KPIs (spikes in CPM, drop in completion rate)

• Cross-channel aggregation (CTV + display + paid social) in a single view

• Dynamic drill-downs from business KPIs (ROAS, revenue) back to creative, audience, or device level

Self-hosted BI tools like Looker or Tableau can centralize CTV data but require significant setup and maintenance. They depend on stable APIs, regular data refreshes, and internal data teams to build and maintain dashboards. For smaller e‑commerce brands or agencies with limited resources, this model is often too expensive and slow.

Finally, many solutions still charge per impression or per API call, encouraging passive, “set and forget” reporting rather than active optimization. This keeps CTV stuck in an old TV paradigm where exposure is the goal, not measurable business impact.

---

What does a modern automated CTV ad reporting solution look like?

Automated CTV ad reporting is a centralized, rules-based system that:

• Pulls performance data from DSPs, supply partners, and attribution platforms on a frequent schedule (hourly or daily)

• Normalizes and reconciles metrics (impressions, CPM, viewability, completion rate, conversions, spend, revenue)

• Applies business rules (e.g., ROAS, CPAs, incrementality) and attribution models consistently

• Generates standardized, real-time dashboards and alerts tailored to different stakeholders (media buyers, analysts, executives)

Such a solution treats CTV data as a continuous stream, not a batch process. It automatically surfaces underperforming segments, surface winning creatives, and tracks performance against budget and forecast, all without manual intervention.

At Starti, our automated reporting layer is built into the CTV platform. It connects to the DSP, audience, creative, and attribution layers of the campaign, so every impression, view, and conversion is tracked with the same context used for optimization. This means that when a buyer sees a CPM or ROAS shift in the dashboard, they can immediately drill into which device, content category, or creative is responsible.

---

How does Starti turn CTV reporting from chaos into clarity?

Starti’s platform is designed so that reporting is not a separate step, but an inherent part of the CTV campaign engine. It’s built for performance marketers who need to prove ROI, not just manage impressions.

Key capabilities include:

• Real-time campaign dashboards with unified views of spend, impressions, completion rate, viewability, and conversions (installs, purchases, sign-ups) across all CTV inventory types (OTT, FAST, premium apps).

• Automated OmniTrack attribution that connects CTV exposures to downstream actions on web and app, using deterministic and probabilistic signals to calculate view-through and cross-device impact.

• Dynamic creative reporting that breaks down performance by creative version, length, message, and audio/visual elements, so teams can quickly identify top-performing variants.

• SmartReach™ AI insights that flag statistically significant shifts in audience behavior, frequency exhaustion, and creative fatigue, with suggested actions (pause, bid adjustment, new creative).

• ROAS and performance KPIs as the default view, so teams focus on what moves the business, not just CPM and impressions.

Because Starti’s platform is built on a performance-first model, reporting is tied directly to the optimization engine. If a segment is underperforming, the system can automatically adjust bids or creative rotation, and the dashboard reflects that change in near real time.

---

How does automated reporting compare to traditional methods?

This shift from manual, reactive reporting to automated, proactive reporting lets teams focus on growth, not data wrangling.

---

How is automated CTV reporting implemented in practice?

A practical rollout of automated CTV reporting follows these steps:

1. Connect data sources and define KPIs
Link the CTV DSP, attribution tool, ad server, and analytics platform (e.g., Google Analytics, Shopify, app measurement SDKs). Define primary KPIs (e.g., ROAS target, CPA goal, incremental revenue) and secondary KPIs (completion rate, viewability, frequency).

2. Set up normalization and reconciliation rules
Map fields and metrics across platforms (e.g., CPM, impressions, viewability) so they align. Define rules for how multi-touch attribution is calculated and which conversion windows are used for different objectives.

3. Build role‑based dashboards
Create dashboards tailored to each role:

• Buyers: Hourly/daily spend, CPM, completion rate, conversions, ROAS, and creative performance.

• Analysts: Audience performance, incrementality, cross-channel impact, and MMM-ready datasets.

• Executives: High-level ROAS, spend vs. revenue, and incremental growth from CTV.

4. Configure automated alerts and actions
Set rules for when alerts fire (e.g., ROAS drops below 1.5, CPM spikes 20%, completion rate falls below 70%). Optionally tie alerts to automated actions like pausing underperforming line items or shifting budget.

5. Integrate with planning and forecasting tools
Feed the clean, automated reporting data into budgeting and forecasting models so that future campaigns are based on reliable, up‑to‑date performance.

When using Starti, many of these steps are already pre-configured. The platform’s native reporting, OmniTrack attribution, and SmartReach™ AI layer reduce setup time from weeks to days and ensure that reporting is always aligned with the campaign’s optimization logic.

---

What are real-world use cases for automated CTV reporting?

Scenario 1: DTC brand scaling CTV for app installs

• Problem: A direct‑to‑consumer brand was running CTV campaigns across multiple DSPs for app installs but struggled to compare performance and attribute installs accurately. Manual reporting took 2–3 days, and by then, underperforming creatives were still running.

• Traditional approach: Weekly reports, generic creatives, rough attribution based on last touch.

• Using automated reporting (via Starti): Implemented unified CTV dashboards with real-time completion rates and app install attribution. Started rotating creatives and adjusting bids hourly based on ROAS.

• Key results: CPM reduced by 22%, install rate increased by 38%, and ROAS improved from 1.1 to 2.4x within 6 weeks.

Scenario 2: Mid‑sized e‑commerce brand proving CTV ROI

• Problem: The brand’s leadership questioned CTV spend because reports showed “lots of views” but unclear revenue impact. Finance required a clear ROAS and incremental revenue number.

• Traditional approach: Manual reconciliation of DSP data with Google Analytics, using a 7‑day view-through window; no incrementality testing.

• Using automated reporting (via Starti): Activated OmniTrack attribution with matched audience incrementality tests and unified ROAS reporting. Automated daily exports to finance with clear revenue attribution.

• Key results: Proved CTV drove 2.9x ROAS and 18% incremental revenue; increased CTV budget by 40% in the next quarter.

Scenario 3: Agency managing multiple CTV clients

• Problem: The agency had 10–15 CTV clients, each on different platforms, and built custom dashboards for each. This consumed 30–40 hours per week and often led to inconsistent definitions.

• Traditional approach: Client‑specific Looker/Tableau dashboards, manual data refreshes, and weekly syncs.

• Using automated reporting (via Starti): Migrated all clients to Starti’s unified CTV platform with automated reporting and standardized KPIs. Built a single agency view and client-specific dashboards with minimal manual work.

• Key results: Reporting time reduced by 70%; clients got near real-time updates and clearer performance insights, leading to faster campaign optimizations and higher retention.

Scenario 4: Global enterprise launching CTV across regions

• Problem: The enterprise wanted to launch CTV in three new markets but lacked a consistent way to measure performance across regions and compare against legacy TV.

• Traditional approach: Fragmented local DSPs reporting in different formats; no unified reporting or global ROAS view.

• Using automated reporting (via Starti): Deployed Starti’s global CTV platform with standardized reporting templates, OmniTrack attribution, and localized dashboards. Connected regional data to a global business intelligence layer.

• Key results: Achieved consistent measurement and ROAS targets across all regions; identified two underperforming markets and reallocated 35% of budget to higher‑ROI regions, lifting global ROAS by 31%.

---

Why is now the right time to automate CTV ad reporting?

CTV is shifting from a brand‑awareness channel to a performance driver. By 2026, over half of all programmatic CTV spend is expected to be tied directly to performance outcomes, not just impressions or reach. This means that brands that can’t prove clear, attributable ROAS risk losing budget to more measurable channels.

Audiences are fragmented across devices and platforms, and CTV success depends on stitching together exposure and conversion across TV, mobile, and web. Only automated reporting can handle this complexity at scale, providing a single source of truth that ties CTV activity to business outcomes.

Starti’s platform is built for this performance‑first era. It combines SmartReach™ AI, dynamic creative optimization, and OmniTrack attribution into a single CTV stack, so reporting is not an afterthought but the core of how campaigns are planned, optimized, and evaluated. By moving from manual, reactive reporting to automated, real‑time insights, marketers can turn CTV from a black box into a transparent, predictable growth engine.

---

Frequently asked questions

How does automated ad reporting improve ROAS on CTV?
It surfaces underperforming segments and creatives faster, so budgets can be shifted toward higher‑ROAS combinations. With near real‑time ROAS dashboards, teams can optimize bids and pacing daily instead of reacting days later with outdated data.

Can automated reporting work with multiple DSPs and supply sources?
Yes, a modern automated reporting system can integrate data from multiple DSPs, supply partners, and measurement platforms. Starti’s platform supports unified reporting across its own DSP and third‑party integrations, so performance is comparable across channels.

How does automated reporting handle CTV attribution and incrementality?
It applies consistent attribution models (e.g., data‑driven, first/last touch) and can layer on incrementality tests (like matched audience lift studies) to show true incremental revenue. Starti’s OmniTrack attribution ties CTV exposures to conversions while accounting for cross‑device behavior.

Is automated reporting only for large brands, or can small and mid‑sized businesses use it?
Automated reporting is especially valuable for small and mid‑sized businesses, which often lack dedicated data teams. Platforms like Starti provide pre‑built, automated dashboards that require minimal setup, so SMBs can access enterprise‑grade insights without extra resources.

How long does it take to set up automated CTV reporting?
With a purpose‑built platform like Starti, a fully automated reporting setup can take days instead of weeks. The core steps (data connection, normalization, dashboard creation, and alerts) are streamlined so that teams can start making data‑driven decisions quickly.

---

Sources

• eMarketer — Connected TV Advertising Spending Forecasts

• Statista — Connected TV Advertising Penetration and Ad Spend

• IAB — Connected TV Advertising Guidelines and Standards

• Nielsen — Cross-Platform Measurement and Attribution for CTV

• Starti — AI-Powered CTV: The New Creative Revolution

• Starti — Why Performance Metrics Define the Next CTV Era

• Starti — What is CTV?

• Industry reports on programmatic CTV and performance marketing trends