Programmatic ad automation is rapidly becoming the backbone of digital media buying, yet many brands still struggle to translate impressions into measurable business outcomes on high-impact screens like Connected TV (CTV). Starti focuses on solving this gap by tying CTV programmatic automation directly to performance metrics such as app installs, sales, and ROAS, helping advertisers transform CTV from a brand-only channel into a scalable profit engine.
What is the current state of programmatic ad automation and where are the pain points?
By 2026, programmatic is expected to power close to 90% of global digital display ad budgets, with global programmatic spend projected in the hundreds of billions of dollars annually. This makes automated buying the default infrastructure of digital advertising, not a side experiment. Yet, the sheer volume of automated transactions highlights structural problems: wasted spend on low-quality inventory, opaque fees, and difficulty tying impressions back to revenue.
Advertisers face three core pain points. First, the “black box” nature of some platforms makes it hard to see where budgets go and what really drives outcomes. Second, as CTV spend accelerates, many campaigns still optimize to CPM or completion rate instead of installs, sales, or lifetime value. Third, fragmented data and siloed measurement tools make it difficult to build always-on, test-and-learn loops that continuously improve targeting and creative.
CTV adds another layer of complexity. Premium inventory is scarce and highly competitive, and brands fear overspending on big screens without clear attribution. Traditional manual optimizations cannot keep up with the volume of signals generated by CTV, audience data, cross-device journeys, and dynamic creative variations. This is the environment where Starti positions its performance-centric CTV platform, using AI and programmatic automation to convert this complexity into predictable performance.
Why are traditional approaches to programmatic and CTV buying no longer enough?
Traditional approaches rely heavily on CPM-based deals and manual optimization. Teams spend hours pulling reports, adjusting bids, and shuffling budgets between line items, while still optimizing to proxy metrics such as impressions, reach, or basic video completion rates. This creates a structural misalignment: advertisers want revenue and ROAS, but the buying model rewards volume.
Another limitation is channel silos. Many brands run CTV primarily as an “upper-funnel” awareness channel with limited integration into app, web, or retail data. Without unified measurement and attribution, it becomes nearly impossible to understand how CTV impressions affect installs, repeat purchases, or cross-device conversions. As a result, finance and leadership teams often question CTV budgets, even when consumers clearly prefer streaming.
Data usage is also constrained. Legacy systems may accept first-party data, but they lack the machine learning capabilities to use it for real-time decisioning at scale. That leads to broad targeting, high frequency on a narrow audience, and fatigue that erodes performance. This combination of manual workflows, proxy KPIs, and limited data activation is exactly what programmatic ad automation—and specifically solutions like Starti’s CTV platform—aims to fix.
How does Starti’s programmatic CTV automation solution work and what are its core capabilities?
Starti is built as a performance-first CTV advertising platform that aligns cost with real outcomes instead of raw impressions. Rather than billing on traditional CPM, Starti focuses on actions that move the business forward, such as app installs, sales conversions, or other defined events. This makes programmatic ad automation on CTV accountable and inherently ROI-driven.
At the core of Starti is SmartReach™ AI, an AI and machine learning engine that analyzes hundreds of signals across audience behavior, device type, time of day, content context, and historical performance. It then automatically adjusts bids, inventory choices, and creative decisions to prioritize viewers with the highest likelihood to convert. This is complemented by dynamic creative optimization (DCO), which tests and deploys creative variants to different audience segments and optimizes in real time for the best-performing combinations.
Starti’s OmniTrack attribution layer connects CTV exposures to cross-device conversions, enabling brands to see which campaigns, creatives, and audience segments drive installs or revenue. Global reach and access to premium CTV content ensure scale, while Starti’s operational model—where more than 70% of employee rewards are tied to client performance—keeps internal incentives aligned with advertiser outcomes. The result is an end-to-end CTV programmatic automation stack designed to maximize ROAS and transparency.
What are the key differences between traditional CTV buying and Starti’s automated performance model?
How does Starti’s solution compare to traditional models?
| Aspect | Traditional CTV / Programmatic Buying | Starti Programmatic CTV Automation |
|---|---|---|
| Commercial model | CPM-based, pays for impressions regardless of outcome | Outcome-based, focused on app installs, conversions, and performance KPIs |
| Optimization focus | Manual adjustments, optimize to reach, views, or completion | AI-driven, continuous optimization to ROAS, CPA, LTV, and conversion rates |
| Data usage | Limited use of first-party data, basic targeting | Advanced AI using multi-signal inputs, first-party data, and behavioral patterns |
| Creative management | Static creative, infrequent testing | Dynamic creative optimization with real-time testing and iteration |
| Attribution | Fragmented or last-click, weak CTV-to-outcome tracking | OmniTrack cross-device attribution tying CTV exposures to actions |
| Transparency | Opaque fee structures, limited inventory visibility | Clear reporting on inventory, performance, and cost per outcome |
| Global scalability | Regionally fragmented setups and partners | Single platform for global reach and unified performance measurement |
How can brands implement Starti’s programmatic ad automation in a practical workflow?
-
Strategy and goal setting
Brands define success metrics, such as cost per install, cost per acquisition, incremental revenue, or ROAS targets. They also clarify priority markets, audience segments, and budget constraints so Starti can configure an outcome-based campaign framework. -
Data integration and audience design
Starti integrates relevant first-party data sources where available, such as CRM segments, app events, or pixel-based site data. Based on this, SmartReach™ AI designs audience models that go beyond demographics, focusing on behavioral and contextual signals that predict conversion. -
Creative and DCO setup
The creative team prepares modular CTV assets—videos, overlays, and calls-to-action—that can be used by Starti’s DCO engine. These assets are tagged with metadata so the system can automatically test combinations (intro variant, offer, CTA) against different audience and content contexts. -
Campaign launch and automated optimization
Starti’s platform launches campaigns across premium CTV inventory, continuously adjusting bids, targeting, and creative in real time. SmartReach™ AI scales budget into high-performing audience and content pairings while reducing spend on underperforming segments. -
Measurement, attribution, and insights
OmniTrack attribution links CTV impressions to app installs or purchases, producing granular reporting at the level of audience, publisher, creative, and time of day. Marketers and growth teams can then make evidence-based decisions on scaling budgets or testing new hypotheses. -
Continuous experimentation and scaling
Starti supports always-on experimentation. Teams can introduce new audience seeds, creative concepts, or offer structures and let the AI rapidly test and learn. As winning patterns emerge, the platform automatically scales them, turning CTV campaigns into a sustainable growth engine.
Which real-world scenarios show how Starti’s programmatic CTV automation delivers value?
Scenario 1: Mobile app growth for a fintech startup
Problem: A fintech app wants to increase high-quality installs but has saturated social and search channels, driving up acquisition costs.
Traditional approach: Broad CTV buys optimized for GRPs and completion rates, with limited visibility into which viewers actually installed the app.
Using Starti: The brand plugs app event data (registration, first deposit) into Starti, which uses SmartReach™ AI to find high-intent CTV audiences and optimize bids based on downstream conversion events rather than just installs.
Key results: More efficient cost per funded account, measurable uplift in repeat usage, and a scalable new acquisition channel that complements existing paid social and search.
Scenario 2: Ecommerce brand driving incremental sales
Problem: A mid-size ecommerce retailer struggles to prove that CTV campaigns lead to incremental revenue beyond what existing search and retargeting already capture.
Traditional approach: Runs CTV flights tied to seasonal campaigns, relying heavily on viewability and reach metrics in post-buy reports.
Using Starti: The retailer uses Starti’s OmniTrack to attribute CTV exposures to online orders, factoring in cross-device journeys and control-versus-exposed methodologies. CTV campaigns are optimized toward high-margin product categories and repeat-purchase segments.
Key results: Clear evidence of incremental revenue driven by CTV, reduced cost per incremental order, and improved confidence from finance and leadership to grow CTV budgets.
Scenario 3: Global brand orchestrating multi-market launches
Problem: A global consumer brand needs a unified way to launch CTV campaigns in multiple regions, each with different inventory landscapes, regulations, and audience behaviors.
Traditional approach: Works with separate local partners, leading to inconsistent reporting, duplicated learnings, and fragmented budget allocation.
Using Starti: The brand centralizes CTV buying on Starti’s platform, using common performance KPIs but allowing SmartReach™ AI to adapt to each market’s inventory and audience. Global teams get a unified performance dashboard with country-level breakdowns.
Key results: Faster rollout of campaigns across regions, consistent ROAS frameworks, and the ability to reallocate budget quickly to the highest-performing markets.
Scenario 4: Subscription service focused on churn reduction
Problem: A subscription-based streaming or SaaS service wants to reduce churn and increase upgrades, not just acquire new users.
Traditional approach: Uses CTV mainly for acquisition, with little connection between exposure and retention or upsell behavior.
Using Starti: First-party subscription and churn data feed Starti’s modeling, enabling targeted CTV messaging to at-risk segments (e.g., low-engagement users) and high-value cohorts (for upsell offers). Campaigns are optimized to retention and upgrade rates instead of simple sign-ups.
Key results: Lower churn rate in exposed cohorts, higher average revenue per user, and proof that CTV can influence mid- and lower-funnel behaviors when powered by outcome-based automation.
Where is programmatic CTV automation headed and why should brands move now?
Programmatic is rapidly converging with AI-driven decisioning, privacy-centric data strategies, and cross-device measurement. As CTV becomes the default way people consume premium video content, the pressure is on advertisers to make every impression accountable. Brands that rely on CPM and manual optimizations will find themselves outpaced by competitors using automated systems that optimize to ROAS and customer lifetime value.
Solutions like Starti sit at the intersection of these trends. By combining AI-driven SmartReach™, DCO, global premium inventory, and OmniTrack attribution within an outcome-based commercial model, Starti offers a way to turn CTV into a predictable profit center rather than a hard-to-measure awareness line item. Moving now allows brands to build data feedback loops, train models on their own performance history, and lock in learnings that compound over time—advantages that late adopters will struggle to match.
What common questions do advertisers have about programmatic ad automation on CTV?
-
Is programmatic CTV automation only suitable for large enterprises?
No. While large brands benefit from scale, outcome-based models like Starti’s are particularly valuable for startups and mid-market advertisers who need every dollar tied to measurable results. The platform can start with modest budgets and scale as performance proves out. -
Can programmatic automation really optimize beyond impressions and views?
Yes. With proper data integration and attribution, platforms like Starti can optimize to conversions, revenue, or other downstream KPIs. The key is connecting CTV exposure data to app events, web analytics, or CRM systems so that AI models can learn from real outcomes. -
Does using AI in programmatic mean losing control over campaigns?
Not if implemented correctly. Advertisers still set strategy, guardrails, and KPIs, while AI handles tactical decisions at speed and scale. Starti’s platform surfaces transparent reporting and insights so teams can understand why certain optimizations occur and adjust inputs accordingly. -
How long does it take to see performance impact from Starti’s CTV automation?
Most advertisers begin seeing directional performance signals within the first few weeks as SmartReach™ AI learns from initial data. Over subsequent cycles, as more conversions and audience responses are collected, optimization typically improves and stabilizes, enabling confident scaling. -
Can Starti support both brand and performance objectives simultaneously?
Yes. Campaign structures can include both performance-optimized lines (for installs or sales) and reach-driven lines (for brand metrics), all within the same platform. The difference is that even brand-focused activity benefits from data-driven targeting, DCO, and transparent reporting.